Should “the Holocaust” be discarded, or what’s in a name? Historiography(ies), memory(ies) and metanarrative(s)
[nb-NO]Title[nb-NO]Should “the Holocaust” be discarded, or what’s in a name? Historiography(ies), memory(ies) and metanarrative(s)
[nb-NO]Author[nb-NO]
Call number940.5318072/0076
[nb-NO]Object number[nb-NO]10591C
[nb-NO]Place of publication[nb-NO]Stockholm, Sweden
[nb-NO]Year of publication[nb-NO]
2020
[nb-NO]Pagination[nb-NO]pp29-51
[nb-NO]Material[nb-NO]Article
NotesArticle from the book 'Holocaust remembrance and representation' pp29-51
[nb-NO]Description[nb-NO]
Although the term “Holocaust” had begun to emerge in the 1950s as a designation for the fate of the Jews during the Nazi period, the crime, or crimes still had no established and well-known name other than the term “genocide”, “final solution”, extermination”, “mass terror” and ”persecution”. Its ubiquity today might be taken for granted, but tracing the development of the term ”Holocaust” is almost impossible