![[nb-NO]Go to[nb-NO] Sydney Jewish Museum [nb-NO]Home page[nb-NO]](/AIS/Content/Images/logo_b3660c53.svg){kind=logo}
What may not be, cannot be: a plea for rendering factual the controversy about recent history
[nb-NO]Title[nb-NO]What may not be, cannot be: a plea for rendering factual the controversy about recent history
[nb-NO]Author[nb-NO]
Call number940.5318072/0050
[nb-NO]Object number[nb-NO]07295ad
[nb-NO]Place of publication[nb-NO]Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, United States
[nb-NO]Publisher[nb-NO]Humanities Press
[nb-NO]Year of publication[nb-NO]
1994
[nb-NO]Pagination[nb-NO]pp216-221
[nb-NO]Material[nb-NO]Article
[nb-NO]ISBN[nb-NO]1573925916
NotesArticle from the book 'Forever in the shadow of Hitler'pp216-221
[nb-NO]Description[nb-NO]
Discusses the views of Habermas, Nolte and others. The author holds the view that the conception of totalitarianism is the interpretation that best explains Nazi dictatorship. In contrast to Habermas, the historians under attack have made essential contributions to broadening our knowledge
