Auschwitz as hermeneutic rupture, differend, and image 'malgre tout': Jameson, Lyotard, Didi-Huberman
[nb-NO]Title[nb-NO]Auschwitz as hermeneutic rupture, differend, and image 'malgre tout': Jameson, Lyotard, Didi-Huberman
[nb-NO]Author[nb-NO]
Call number940.5318/0324
[nb-NO]Object number[nb-NO]06779e
[nb-NO]Place of publication[nb-NO]Rochester, New York, United States
[nb-NO]Publisher[nb-NO]Camden House
[nb-NO]Year of publication[nb-NO]
2008
[nb-NO]Pagination[nb-NO]pp114-137
[nb-NO]Material[nb-NO]Article
[nb-NO]Series title[nb-NO]Screen cultures: German film and the visual
[nb-NO]ISBN[nb-NO]9781571133830
NotesArticle fromthe book 'Visualizing the Holocaust' pp114-137
[nb-NO]Description[nb-NO]
Begins with a critique of how two classic elaborations of the postmodern condition - by Frederic Jameson and Jean-Francois Lyotard - deploy Auschwitz as a transitive symbol of hermeneutic impasse or of an absolute limit to thought and representation. The second part of the essay explores a polemic between, on one side, the art historian Georges Didi-Huberman and, on the other, Claude Lanzmann about the photographic representability of the Shoah that arose around a 2001 Paris exhibit of photographs of concentration camps.