controversy that isn't: the debate over Daniel J.Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioner's in comparative perspective
[nb-NO]Title[nb-NO]The controversy that isn't: the debate over Daniel J.Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioner's in comparative perspective
[nb-NO]Author[nb-NO]
Call number940.5318/0226 Vol.6
[nb-NO]Object number[nb-NO]04326n
[nb-NO]Place of publication[nb-NO]London, England
[nb-NO]Publisher[nb-NO]Routledge
[nb-NO]Year of publication[nb-NO]
2004
[nb-NO]Pagination[nb-NO]pp340-368
[nb-NO]Material[nb-NO]Article
[nb-NO]ISBN[nb-NO]0415275091
NotesArticle from the book 'Holocaust: critical concepts in historical studies' Vol.6 pp340-368
[nb-NO]Description[nb-NO]
Concludes that the controversy over Goldhagen's book may well reflect new trends in the memory of the Holocaust, but the absence of broader factors underlying the furor suggests that the book's reputation will diminish over time.