What may not be, cannot be: a plea for rendering factual the controversy about recent history
TitreWhat may not be, cannot be: a plea for rendering factual the controversy about recent history
Auteur
Call number940.5318072/0050
N° d'objet07295ad
Lieu de publicationAtlantic Highlands, New Jersey, United States
EditeurHumanities Press
Année de publication
1994
Paginationpp216-221
MatérielArticle
ISBN1573925916
NotesArticle from the book 'Forever in the shadow of Hitler'pp216-221
Description
Discusses the views of Habermas, Nolte and others. The author holds the view that the conception of totalitarianism is the interpretation that best explains Nazi dictatorship. In contrast to Habermas, the historians under attack have made essential contributions to broadening our knowledge